![]() Skeptics generally abandon their dogmas they suspect and begin to establish an independent cognitive map. Believers ignore the distortion in favor of dogma, in the hope of a future solution or re-organize their dogmas to fit their intellectual achievements. Intellectual development distort the internal consistency of the “dogmatic map” and people react to this distortion in different ways to make the dogmatic map consistent again. Subsequent intellectual achievements strengthen the chosen paradigm and makes a person’s belief or disbelief stable but increases or decreases the suspicious belief based upon the situation. Individuals make a choice when they are young, between holding a certain belief or disbelief on the one hand, or being a skeptic on the other. ![]() The author asserts a dynamic model to address this ambiguity. ![]() Others posited, religiosity is positively associated with these factors or is unresponsive to them. Numerous studies suggested that intelligence and exposure to higher education reduce religiosity. Intellectuality and religiosity are controversial concepts in terms of their relationship.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |